Publication | Closed Access
The nature and development of preservice science teachers' conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy
206
Citations
15
References
1994
Year
Inquiry-based LearningScience EducationScience TeachingEducationClassroom DiscourseInstructional ModelsPedagogy Knowledge StructureElementary EducationPedagogy Knowledge StructuresKnowledge Structure RepresentationsTeaching MethodPre-service Teacher EducationTeacher EducationStem EducationLearning By TeachingTeacher DevelopmentLanguage StudiesCognitive ScienceScientific LiteracyPedagogyLearning SciencesSubject MatterPre-service PreparationCurriculumTeachingPreservice Science TeachersProfessional DevelopmentTeacher Preparation
Abstract The purpose of this study was to assess the development and changes in preservice science teachers' subject matter and pedagogy knowledge structures as they proceeded through a professional teacher education program. Twelve secondary preservice science teachers were asked to create representations of their subject matter and pedagogy knowledge structures periodically (four times spanning the entirety of their subject‐specific teacher education program) and participate in a videotaped interview concerning the eight knowledge structure representations immediately following student teaching. Qualitative analyses of knowledge structure representations and transcribed interviews within and between subjects were performed by one of the researchers and “blindly” corroborated by the other two researchers. Initial knowledge structure representations were typically linear and lacked coherence. Both types of knowledge structure representations were highly susceptible to change as a consequence of the act of teaching. Although there was some overlap between subject matter and pedagogy knowledge structures, they were reported to exert separate influences on classroom practice, with the pedagogy knowledge structure having primary influence on instructional decisions. Furthermore, the complexity of one's subject matter structure appeared to be a critical factor in determining whether the structure directly influences classroom practice.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1