2013 · 74 citations · 13 references
ComputingComputer ScienceComputer VisionFeature EngineeringInformation RetrievalDigital Image ProcessingFeature DescriptionFeature DetectionFeature ExtractionImage RetrievalObject DetectionComplexityDescriptor MatchingFeature MatchingImage Feature ExtractionKeypoint DescriptorsLocal Feature DescriptorsLocal Feature DetectionVisual Feature Extraction
Several visual feature extraction algorithms have recently appeared in the literature, with the goal of reducing the computational complexity of state-of-the-art solutions (e.g., SIFT and SURF). Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the performance of these emerging visual descriptors in terms of processing time, repeatability and matching accuracy, and whether they can obtain competitive performance in applications such as image retrieval. This paper aims to provide an up-to-date detailed, clear, and complete evaluation of local feature detector and descriptors, focusing on the methods that were designed with complexity constraints, providing a much needed reference for researchers in this field. Our results demonstrate that recent feature extraction algorithms, e.g., BRISK and ORB, have competitive performance requiring much lower complexity and can be efficiently used in low-power devices.
13
Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF)
Herbert Bay, Andreas Ess, Tinne Tuytelaars et al. · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · 2008 · 13.4K citations
ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF
Ethan Rublee, Vincent Rabaud, Kurt Konolige et al. · 2011 · 10.4K citations
BRISK: Binary Robust invariant scalable keypoints
Stefan Leutenegger, Margarita Chli, Roland Siegwart · 2011 · 3.4K citations · Full text