Neuromuscular Interfacing: Establishing an EMG-Driven Model for the Human Elbow Joint

James W. L. Pau, Sheng Quan Xie, Andrew J. Pullan

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · 2012 · 98 citations · 32 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Assistive devices use EMG to infer user intent, yet neuromuscular interfaces that rely only on EMG without additional signal enhancement remain underdeveloped. This study develops a flexible physiological model of the elbow joint to predict joint motion from EMG signals for both able‑bodied and less‑abled users. The model combines musculotendon force calculations, a musculoskeletal torque model, and a kinematic mapping to translate EMG‑derived muscle forces into elbow joint kinematics. Sensitivity analysis and genetic‑algorithm tuning yielded average RMS errors of 6.53° for a single cycle and 22.4° for random cycles, validating the model and supporting future NI development.

Abstract

Assistive devices aim to mitigate the effects of physical disability by aiding users to move their limbs or by rehabilitating through therapy. These devices are commonly embodied by robotic or exoskeletal systems that are still in development and use the electromyographic (EMG) signal to determine user intent. Not much focus has been placed on developing a neuromuscular interface (NI) that solely relies on the EMG signal, and does not require modifications to the end user's state to enhance the signal (such as adding weights). This paper presents the development of a flexible, physiological model for the elbow joint that is leading toward the implementation of an NI, which predicts joint motion from EMG signals for both able-bodied and less-abled users. The approach uses musculotendon models to determine muscle contraction forces, a proposed musculoskeletal model to determine total joint torque, and a kinematic model to determine joint rotational kinematics. After a sensitivity analysis and tuning using genetic algorithms, subject trials yielded an average root-mean-square error of 6.53° and 22.4° for a single cycle and random cycles of movement of the elbow joint, respectively. This helps us to validate the elbow model and paves the way toward the development of an NI.

References

32