Practitioner perceptions of corporate reputation: an empirical investigation

Roger Bennett, Rita Kottász

Corporate Communications An International Journal · 2000 · 138 citations · 25 references

Concepts

TL;DR

A questionnaire completed by 106 UK PR consultancy owners evaluated the extent of their firms’ client reputation‑management activities and their attitudes toward such work. Respondents reported strong interest in reputation management but noted barriers to implementation, and those offering many reputation services and anticipating rising demand were most aligned with an academic definition of corporate reputation, while most agreed that practitioners, not academics, drive innovation in the field.

Abstract

Owner‐managers or managing directors of 106 UK public relations consultancies completed a questionnaire concerning the extent of their firms’ client reputation management activities and their attitudes and opinions about reputational work. The results suggested widespread interest in the concept and practice of reputation management as an area of activity separate and distinct from other aspects of PR. However, respondents expressed concerns about the existence of barriers to the implementation of reputation management programmes within client companies. The executives most likely to agree with the “academic” definition of corporate reputation were those whose consultancies offered a large number of reputation management services; who believed that the demand for these services was about to rise; and who clearly distinguished between reputational and general PR activities. Only a small percentage of the sample disagreed with the proposition that most innovations in the field of reputation management were attributable to practitioners rather than academics.

References

25