Mega or Micro? Influencer Selection Using Follower Elasticity

Zijun Tian, Ryan Dew, Raghuram Iyengar

Journal of Marketing Research · 2023 · 74 citations · 41 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Influencer marketing has surged, with firms choosing partners based on popularity, ranging from mega‑influencers with millions of followers to micro‑influencers with only a few thousand. The study aims to quantify the trade‑off between popularity and cost by introducing follower elasticity of impressions (FEI), which measures how a video’s view count changes with its creator’s follower growth. FEI is estimated by combining a unique TikTok dataset, a representation‑learning model for video content, and a machine‑learning causal inference method to assess the causal effect of follower size on view counts. FEI is always positive, averaging 0.10, and varies nonlinearly with follower size; the authors identify predictors of FEI curves that enable firms to optimize influencer partnerships.

Abstract

Influencer marketing, in which companies sponsor social media personalities to promote their brands, has exploded in popularity in recent years. One common criterion for selecting an influencer partner is popularity. While some firms collaborate with “mega” influencers with millions of followers, other firms partner with “micro” influencers with only several thousand followers, but who also cost less to sponsor. To quantify this trade-off between popularity and cost, the authors develop a framework for estimating the follower elasticity of impressions (FEI), which measures a video's percentage gain in impressions (i.e., views) corresponding to a percentage increase in the number of followers of its creator. Computing FEI involves estimating the causal effect of an influencer's popularity on the view counts of their videos, which is achieved through a combination of (1) a unique data set collected from TikTok, (2) a representation learning model for quantifying video content, and (3) a machine learning–based causal inference method. The authors find that FEI is always positive, averaging .10, but often nonlinearly related to follower size. They examine the factors that predict variation in these FEI curves and show how firms can use these results to better determine influencer partnerships.

References

41