The dynamic relationship between response processes and self-regulation in critical thinking assessments

Heidi Hyytinen, Jani Ursin, Kaisa Silvennoinen, Katri Kleemola, Auli Toom

Studies In Educational Evaluation · 2021 · 38 citations · 40 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

• The performance task and selected-response questions trigger different processes. • The performance task evokes holistic response and self-regulatory processes. • Selected-response questions result in fragmented and question-oriented processes. • Students’ response and self-regulatory processes are intertwined. • Variation in self-regulation is associated with the complexity of response processes. Our aim was to explore higher education students’ response and self-regulatory processes plus the relationship between these, as evidenced in two types of performance-based critical thinking tasks included in the Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA+) International instrument. The data collection consisted of 20 cognitive laboratories. The data were analyzed using a qualitative approach. The tasks were found to trigger different response and self-regulatory processes. Overall, the performance task evoked more holistic processes than the selected-response questions, in which students’ processes were more question-oriented. The results also indicated the entanglement of students’ response and self-regulation processes. Three self-regulation groups were identified. Students with versatile self-regulation skills were able to complete the task thoroughly, whereas students with moderate self-regulation skills faced challenges in monitoring and evaluating their performance. Students who were lacking in self-regulation struggled both with the task as a whole and their own progress. Implications for higher education are discussed.

References

40