SSRN Electronic Journal · 1998 · 31 citations · 0 references
Open access
EducationMathematics EducationSecondary EducationEducation ReformIndividual DifferencesSecondary Mathematics EducationAbility ComparisonAbility GroupingStudent Achievement AnalysisEducational Ability ComparisonHeterogeneous Ability GroupingSchool AllocationSchool EffectivenessStudent Growth ModelingTracking EffectsTracking In SchoolsWithin-class Ability Grouping
Using different comparison groups than in earlier work, we find that ability tracking in math classes has little effect on growth in student math achievement. Previous articles use dummy variables to compare students from classes of high, middle and low ability to the average heterogeneously grouped student. This paper furthers the research by controlling for ability groups at each type of school and establishes that tracking schools differ little from non-tracking schools in terms of student achievement growth. The paper also shows that the allocation of students and resources among classes is remarkably similar between the two types of schools. * National Opinion Research Center