International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · 2020 · 580 citations · 63 references
EducationComputer ScienceHigher EducationArtificial Intelligence In EducationData MiningMachine LearningStudent Risk IdentificationStudent SuccessStudent Success AnalyticsComputer Science LiteracyData Mining EducationLearner Performance PredictionPredictive Modeling In EducationPredictive Student AnalyticsStudent Success IndicatorsStudent Success PredictionSystematic Literature Review
Student success is a key institutional metric, and early identification of at‑risk learners can improve outcomes, yet machine‑learning prediction methods are largely confined to educators with computer‑science expertise and require many design choices. The study offers a step‑by‑step guide for educators to apply data‑mining techniques to predict student success. By reviewing the literature, the authors assembled a systematic process that comprehensively explains decision points and parameter choices for applying data‑mining methods.
Abstract Student success plays a vital role in educational institutions, as it is often used as a metric for the institution’s performance. Early detection of students at risk, along with preventive measures, can drastically improve their success. Lately, machine learning techniques have been extensively used for prediction purpose. While there is a plethora of success stories in the literature, these techniques are mainly accessible to “computer science”, or more precisely, “artificial intelligence” literate educators. Indeed, the effective and efficient application of data mining methods entail many decisions, ranging from how to define student’s success , through which student attributes to focus on , up to which machine learning method is more appropriate to the given problem . This study aims to provide a step-by-step set of guidelines for educators willing to apply data mining techniques to predict student success. For this, the literature has been reviewed, and the state-of-the-art has been compiled into a systematic process, where possible decisions and parameters are comprehensively covered and explained along with arguments. This study will provide to educators an easier access to data mining techniques, enabling all the potential of their application to the field of education.
63
SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique
Nitesh V. Chawla, Kevin W. Bowyer, Lawrence Hall et al. · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · 2002 · 31.2K citations · Full text
Wrappers for feature subset selection
Ron Kohavi, George H. John · Artificial Intelligence · 1997 · 8.9K citations
An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection.
2003 · 6.6K citations
Top 10 algorithms in data mining
Xindong Wu, Vipin Kumar, J. R. Quinlan et al. · Knowledge and Information Systems · 2007 · 5.7K citations