Publication | Open Access
Teachers developing assessment for learning: impact on student achievement
648
Citations
12
References
2004
Year
EducationMean Effect SizeElementary EducationTeacher EducationMathematics EducationStudent EvaluationsFormative Assessment StrategiesClassroom AssessmentStudent AchievementLearning SciencesEducational TestingEducational LeadershipEducational StatisticsEducational MeasurementStudent AssessmentFormative AssessmentTeacher EvaluationReading AssessmentHigher Education AssessmentEducational AssessmentEducational Evaluation
Formative assessment is known to improve learning quality, yet schools often avoid it due to pressure to raise external test scores. The study examines secondary students’ achievement in classrooms where teachers actively developed formative assessment strategies. Twenty‑four teachers in six schools received six‑month support to design and implement formative assessment plans, with prior attainment measures and comparison classes used to compute effect sizes. The intervention produced a modest positive effect, with a mean effect size of 0.32.
While it is generally acknowledged that increased use of formative assessment (or assessment for learning) leads to higher quality learning, it is often claimed that the pressure in schools to improve the results achieved by students in externally‐set tests and examinations precludes its use. This paper reports on the achievement of secondary school students who worked in classrooms where teachers made time to develop formative assessment strategies. A total of 24 teachers (2 science and 2 mathematics teachers, in each of six schools in two LEAs) were supported over a six‐month period in exploring and planning their approach to formative assessment, and then, beginning in September 1999, the teachers put these plans into action with selected classes. In order to compute effect sizes, a measure of prior attainment and at least one comparison group was established for each class (typically either an equivalent class taught in the previous year by the same teacher, or a parallel class taught by another teacher). The mean effect size in favour of the intervention was 0.32.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1