Business Strategy and the Environment · 2005 · 132 citations · 30 references
ManagementEnvironmental ManagementPerformance ManagementBalanced ScorecardCorporate Environmental ManagementPerformance MeasurementBalanced Scorecard DesignCorporate SustainabilityEnvironmental Performance MeasurementEnvironmental SustainabilitySocial Performance MeasurementSustainability Performance MeasurementCorporate Environmental Performance EvaluationEnvironmental Performance IndicatorsEnvironmental Performance ManagementEnvironmental Performance ScorecardsPerformance FrameworkSocial Performance AssessmentSocial Performance EvaluationSustainability Performance Evaluation
Financial aspects of environmental and social company activities are also included. A thematic balanced scorecard format was applied to evaluate environmental and social performance of 13 large Portuguese companies, categorizing them by a predefined performance framework. The analysis identified three performance categories—compliance with law and pollution control, pollution prevention, and eco‑efficiency—highlighting that management tools and procedures are most relevant for categorization, while data limitations hinder quantitative environmental burden assessment; the balanced scorecard revealed strengths and weaknesses linking objectives to outcomes, and showed that environmental improvements coincide with social performance gains, indicating a feasible multi‑level sustainability categorization, with driving forces varying across categories. © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Abstract A thematic balanced scorecard format was used to address environmental and social performance evaluation of 13 large companies operating in Portugal. Financial aspects of environmental and social company activities are also included. Companies were categorized as to their actual performance status using a predefined performance framework. Three categories were found: compliance with the law while emphasizing pollution control, pollution prevention and eco‐efficiency. Management tools and procedural matters were found to be most relevant for categorization. Often, reported information did not allow for quantitative evaluation of environmental burden reduction. Use of the thematic balanced scorecard format was useful to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of links between objectives and measurements, initiatives and achievements. Improvement as to environmental performance was found to be paralleled by increased social performance, suggesting that a multi‐level ‘sustainability’ performance categorization of these Portuguese companies is feasible. Driving forces for environmental management initiatives were found to differ by category of performance. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
30
The balanced scorecard : measures that drive performance
R. S. Caplan · Harvard business review · 1992 · 12.2K citations
Management, Performance Management, Strategic Management +14
The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action
Long Range Planning · 1997 · 8.3K citations
The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance.
Robert S. Kaplan · PubMed · 1992 · 6.6K citations
International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
Barry Turner · 2003 · 3K citations