IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation · 2003 · 182 citations · 45 references
EngineeringAutonomous SystemsSurgeryMedical RoboticsRoboticsSurgical InstrumentationMinimally Invasive SurgeryRobot-assisted SurgerySurgical Instrument ClassificationSurgical RoboticsTeleoperated Surgical SystemsAutonomous Surgical AssistanceAutonomy In SurgeryMinimally Invasive Surgical RobotsRobotic Surgical Instrument ClassificationRobotic Surgical SystemsSurgical Assistive RobotsTeleoperated SurgeryTeleoperated Surgical Robotics
Computer‑assisted surgery has advanced rapidly due to improvements in medical imaging and evolving surgical instruments, creating a discontinuous leap beyond traditional procedures. The paper surveys robotic systems for computer‑assisted surgery, classifying them by intelligence level and focusing on minimally invasive surgical tools and components. The authors classify robotic surgical devices into handheld augmenting tools, teleoperated tools, and autonomous robots, based on scale, degrees of freedom, autonomy, embedded intelligence, and surgeon‑patient interface features.
In this survey paper, the authors analyze the general structure of robotic systems for computer-assisted surgery, present a classification of such systems based on the degree of "intelligence" of the tools, and discuss some examples of different classes of devices. Computer-assisted surgery accelerated progress is related, on the one hand, to the improvement of medical imaging techniques and, on the other hand, to the evolution of surgical instrumentation. The integration of these two factors has determined an extraordinary progress that is not just a "linear" temporal development, but it is a "discontinuity" as regards traditional surgical procedures. Specifically, the authors consider the following classes of robotic-derived surgical devices/systems: a) handheld tools augmenting the capabilities of the surgeon; b) teleoperated surgical tools; and c) autonomous surgical robots. The paper will focus essentially on the analysis of systems and components of robots and tools designed for minimally invasive surgery. Although different classification methods exist on the basis of the clinical needs and/or on the design approach, the devices which will be illustrated in this paper are classified on the basis of their scale, degrees of freedom, autonomy, embedded intelligence, and features of the interface between the surgeon and the patient.
45