An Analysis of Misconceptions in Science Textbooks: Earth science in England and Wales

Chris King

International Journal of Science Education · 2009 · 146 citations · 55 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The study reflects the prevalence of earth science misconceptions among UK secondary science teachers. The study aims to guide textbook authors and educators to improve earth science teaching. The authors surveyed 29 textbooks, identified 15 frequent misconceptions, presented textbook quotes and consensus views, and compared these with literature. Surveys of 29 textbooks (51 texts) revealed over 500 misconceptions, averaging one per page, especially in sedimentary processes, earthquakes, and plate tectonics, and these mirror misconceptions in students and teachers, reinforcing them.

Abstract

Surveys of the earth science content of all secondary (high school) science textbooks and related publications used in England and Wales have revealed high levels of error/misconception. The 29 science textbooks or textbook series surveyed (51 texts in all) showed poor coverage of National Curriculum earth science and contained a mean level of one earth science error/misconception per page. Science syllabuses and examinations surveyed also showed errors/misconceptions. More than 500 instances of misconception were identified through the surveys. These were analysed for frequency, indicating that those areas of the earth science curriculum most prone to misconception are sedimentary processes/rocks, earthquakes/Earth's structure, and plate tectonics. For the 15 most frequent misconceptions, examples of quotes from the textbooks are given, together with the scientific consensus view, a discussion, and an example of a misconception of similar significance in another area of science. The misconceptions identified in the surveys are compared with those described in the literature. This indicates that the misconceptions found in college students and pre‐service/practising science teachers are often also found in published materials, and therefore are likely to reinforce the misconceptions in teachers and their students. The analysis may also reflect the prevalence earth science misconceptions in the UK secondary (high school) science‐teaching population. The analysis and discussion provide the opportunity for writers of secondary science materials to improve their work on earth science and to provide a platform for improved teaching and learning of earth science in the future.

References

55