Assessing the performance of specialist registrars

Andrew Wragg, Winnie Wade, Geraint Fuller, George Cowan, Peter Mills

Clinical Medicine · 2003 · 126 citations · 11 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Assessing doctors' performance during clinical work is challenging, but objective‑based curricula enable the Royal Colleges of Physicians to develop reliable in‑service assessment methods. The study aims to evaluate the validity, reliability, and feasibility of three assessment methods: an adapted mini‑CEX, DOPS, and 360° team assessment. The methods will be studied in routine clinical care. Although demanding time from trainees and trainers, these methods represent a significant advance over the current system, which lacks evidence in the assessment process.

Abstract

Assessing the performance of doctors while they are engaged in clinical work is a challenging concept. The introduction of objective-based curricula provides the stimulus and opportunity for the Royal Colleges of Physicians to develop relevant and reliable methods of in-service assessment. We propose to pilot a study investigating the validity, reliability and feasibility of three assessment methods - direct observation of the clinical encounter using an adapted mini-CEX, direct observation of the performance of practical procedures (DOPS), and the doctor9s ability to perform effectively as part of a team using 360° assessment. The methods will be studied in the setting of routine clinical care. Whilst demanding of time from both trainees and trainers, they will represent a significant advance on the current system which is characterised by a lack of evidence in the assessment process.

References

11