Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · 2006 · 63 citations · 11 references
Public HealthBiostatisticsBayesian BiostatisticsDose-response ModelingPharmacoeconomic ModelingBayesian Adaptive DesignBayesian Clinical TrialsDose Adjustment In OncologyDose CalculationDose OptimizationDose SelectionAdaptive Dose EscalationAdaptive Dose-findingBayesian Dose EscalationBayesian Dose-findingBayesian Dosing AlgorithmsBayesian Phase Ii TrialsDose-finding Trial DesignPhase Ii Clinical Trials
The purpose of this paper is to describe and illustrate an outcome-adaptive Bayesian procedure, proposed by Thall and Cook (2004), for assigning doses of an experimental treatment to successive cohorts of patients. The method uses elicited (efficacy, toxicity) probability pairs to construct a family of trade-off contours that are used to quantify the desirability of each dose. This provides a basis for determining a best dose for each cohort. The method combines the goals of conventional Phase I and Phase II trials, and thus may be called a "Phase I-II" design. We first give a general review of the probability model and dose-finding algorithm. We next describe an application to a trial of a biologic agent for treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia, including a computer simulation study to assess the design's average behavior. To illustrate how the method may work in practice, we present a cohort-by-cohort example of a particular trial. We close with a discussion of some practical issues that may arise during implementation.
11
Dose‐Finding Based on Efficacy–Toxicity Trade‐Offs
Peter F. Thall, John D. Cook · Biometrics · 2004 · 510 citations
The bivariate continual reassessment method
Thomas Braun · Controlled Clinical Trials · 2002 · 272 citations