Comparison of 4T and 6T FinFET SRAM Cells for Subthreshold Operation Considering Variability—A Model-Based Approach

Abstract

This paper investigates the cell stability of recently introduced four-transistor (4T) and conventional six-transistor (6T) fin-shaped field-effect transistor static random access memory (SRAM) cells operating in a subthreshold region using an efficient model-based approach to consider the impact of device variations. Compared with the 6T cell, this paper indicates that 4T SRAM cells exhibit a better nominal READ static noise margin (RSNM) because of the reduced READ disturb. For 4T cells, the nearly ideal values of V <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">write,0</sub> and V <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">wriet,1</sub> guarantee the positive nominal WRITE static noise margin (WSNM) for selected cells. For half-selected cells on the selected bit line, a sufficient margin is observed between WRITE time (for selected cells) and WRITE disturb (for half-selected cells). Using the established model-based approach, the variability of subthreshold 6T and 4T SRAM cells is assessed with 1000 samples. Our results indicate that the 4T driverless cell with a larger μRSNM and a slightly worse σ-RSNM shows a comparable μ/σ ratio in RSNM with the 6T cell. Further more, for a given cell area, 4T SRAM cells using relaxed device dimensions with reduced σ-RSNM can outperform the 6T cell. For WRITE operation, 4T SRAM cells exhibit a superior WSNM, whereas the design margin between WRITE time and WRITE disturb needs to be carefully examined to ensure an adequate margin considering device variability.