Publication | Open Access
Orthographic Depth and Its Impact on Universal Predictors of Reading
769
Citations
38
References
2010
Year
NeurolinguisticsCognitionPsycholinguisticsOrthographic DepthRapid NamingAttentionPhonologyLanguage LearningSecond Language AcquisitionChild LiteracyReading ComprehensionTransparency ContinuumChild LanguageLanguage AcquisitionReadingLanguage StudiesHealth SciencesCognitive SciencePhonological AwarenessOrthographyLanguage ComprehensionSpeech PerceptionLinguistics
Alphabetic orthographies vary in letter‑sound transparency, with English being the least transparent, prompting concerns about the generality of English‑based findings. The study examined how phonological awareness, memory, vocabulary, rapid naming, and nonverbal intelligence predict reading performance across five languages spanning a transparency continuum. The authors measured these predictors in 1,265 Grade 2 children across Finnish, Hungarian, Dutch, Portuguese, and French to assess their influence on reading performance. Phonological awareness emerged as the primary predictor of reading across all languages, with a stronger effect in less transparent orthographies, while rapid naming had a limited, speed‑related influence; overall, most predictors were universal but their relative weights varied systematically with orthographic transparency.
Alphabetic orthographies differ in the transparency of their letter-sound mappings, with English orthography being less transparent than other alphabetic scripts. The outlier status of English has led scientists to question the generality of findings based on English-language studies. We investigated the role of phonological awareness, memory, vocabulary, rapid naming, and nonverbal intelligence in reading performance across five languages lying at differing positions along a transparency continuum (Finnish, Hungarian, Dutch, Portuguese, and French). Results from a sample of 1,265 children in Grade 2 showed that phonological awareness was the main factor associated with reading performance in each language. However, its impact was modulated by the transparency of the orthography, being stronger in less transparent orthographies. The influence of rapid naming was rather weak and limited to reading and decoding speed. Most predictors of reading performance were relatively universal across these alphabetic languages, although their precise weight varied systematically as a function of script transparency.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1