Project Portfolio Control and Portfolio Management Performance in Different Contexts

Ralf Müller, Miia Martinsuo, Tomas Blomquist

Project Management Journal · 2008 · 228 citations · 42 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study examines how project portfolio control techniques relate to portfolio management performance and how this relationship is moderated by internal and external contextual factors such as industry, governance, and geography. The authors surveyed 242 organizations worldwide, analyzed 136 high‑performing responses, and built a contingency model incorporating contextual moderators. They identified three portfolio control factors—selection, reporting, and decision‑making style—and two performance measures—desired results and project/program purpose—and found that different control mechanisms are linked to different performance outcomes.

Abstract

This article investigates the nature and relationship of project portfolio control techniques and portfolio management performance, and how this relationship is moderated by situational idiosyncrasies of internal and external dynamics, industries, governance types, and geographic location. A worldwide questionnaire with 242 responses was used, of which 136 high-performing responses were filtered out for quantitative analysis of best practices. Three portfolio control factors were identified: portfolio selection, portfolio reporting, and decision-making style. Two measures for portfolio management performance were identified: achievement of desired portfolio results and achievement of project and program purpose. The results indicate that different portfolio control mechanisms are associated with different performance measures. A contingency model was developed, including moderating effects by contextual variables.

References

42