Modern Language Journal · 1995 · 25 citations · 16 references
Language StudiesLinguisticsTeachingLanguage EducationLanguage PedagogyLanguage ProficiencyFluency AssessmentLanguage AssessmentLanguage LearningLanguage TeachingSecond Language AcquisitionSpeaking ProficiencyClassroom Language AssessmentIndividual Learner DifferencesLearner Language FluencyLearner Language ProficiencyPerceived FluencyStudent Language ProficiencyTeacher-reported Fluency
Teachers need to be professionals in evaluating learners' linguistic skills, but they also need to be aware of how linguistically naive native speakers perceive learners' performance outside the classroom. This study, therefore, compares 39 native teachers' and 41 native nonteachers' perception of four elementary learners' spoken Japanese. In order to observe learners' performance in a contextualised situation, interviews between a native speaker and a learner were audiotaped and the 80 natives evaluated them according to six criteria: grammar, fluency, appropriateness, vocabulary, comprehensibility, and pronunciation. A questionnaire was also administered to understand the criteria most important in evaluating learners' language and the criteria for distinguishing good from poor language learners. The results suggest that teachers tend be more critical than nonteachers. Comprehensibility seems to be the most important criterion for evaluating learners' language, while the results showed that fluency and grammar discriminated good from poor language learners best.
16
Larry Selinker · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · 1972 · 2.1K citations
Native and Nonnative Judgments of Intelligibility and Irritation
Joan M. Fayer, Emily Krasinski · Language Learning · 1987 · 253 citations
Competing criteria for error gravity
A.N. Hughes · ELT Journal · 1982 · 89 citations