Concepedia

TLDR

Deep transcriptome sequencing has uncovered thousands of novel transcripts, creating a need for rapid methods to distinguish coding from noncoding RNA. The study introduces CPAT, an alignment‑free tool that quickly classifies coding versus noncoding transcripts from large candidate sets. CPAT employs a logistic regression model using ORF size, ORF coverage, Fickett TESTCODE, and hexamer bias, accepts FASTA or BED inputs, and offers a web interface for instant predictions. CPAT achieved 0.96 sensitivity and 0.97 specificity, outperforming other tools, and is roughly four orders of magnitude faster, processing thousands of transcripts in seconds.

Abstract

Thousands of novel transcripts have been identified using deep transcriptome sequencing. This discovery of large and 'hidden' transcriptome rejuvenates the demand for methods that can rapidly distinguish between coding and noncoding RNA. Here, we present a novel alignment-free method, Coding Potential Assessment Tool (CPAT), which rapidly recognizes coding and noncoding transcripts from a large pool of candidates. To this end, CPAT uses a logistic regression model built with four sequence features: open reading frame size, open reading frame coverage, Fickett TESTCODE statistic and hexamer usage bias. CPAT software outperformed (sensitivity: 0.96, specificity: 0.97) other state-of-the-art alignment-based software such as Coding-Potential Calculator (sensitivity: 0.99, specificity: 0.74) and Phylo Codon Substitution Frequencies (sensitivity: 0.90, specificity: 0.63). In addition to high accuracy, CPAT is approximately four orders of magnitude faster than Coding-Potential Calculator and Phylo Codon Substitution Frequencies, enabling its users to process thousands of transcripts within seconds. The software accepts input sequences in either FASTA- or BED-formatted data files. We also developed a web interface for CPAT that allows users to submit sequences and receive the prediction results almost instantly.

References

YearCitations

2010

16.1K

2010

5.2K

2011

3.6K

2005

3.5K

2005

3.3K

2007

3K

2007

2.5K

2010

2.1K

2010

1.7K

2011

1.3K

Page 1