The Special Education Referral and Decision-Making Process for English Language Learners: Child Study Team Meetings and Placement Conferences

Janette K. Klingner, Beth Harry

Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · 2006 · 170 citations · 42 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study examined how school personnel determine special education eligibility for English language learners during child study team meetings and placement conferences, assessing their understanding of second language acquisition and the role of language issues in decision‑making. Researchers observed 19 CST meetings and placement conferences involving English language learners to capture the referral and decision‑making process. Observations revealed that only cursory prereferral strategies were used, most students were directed to testing based on assumptions about the child, personnel knowledge varied widely, meeting quality differed greatly, and these factors indicate the process requires improvement.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the special education referral and decisionmaking process for English language learners (ELLs), with a focus on Child Study Team (CST) meetings and placement conferences/multidisciplinary team meetings. We wished to learn how school personnel determined if ELLs who were struggling had disabilities, to what extent those involved in the process understood second language acquisition, and whether language issues were considered when determining special education eligibility. We observed CST meetings and placement conferences for 19 students who were considered ELLs when they were referred. Findings revealed that in practice, only cursory attention was given to prereferral strategies. Most students were pushed toward testing, based on an assumption that poor academic performance or behavioral difficulties had their origin within the child and indicated a need for special education. Although some school personnel were quite knowledgeable about language issues, many were not. There was tremendous variation in the quality of what transpired during meetings. These differences were influenced by the intentions, knowledge, skills, and commitment of CST or multidisciplinary team members. All the factors we describe point to aspects of the process that should be improved.

References

42