The Review of Economic Studies · 1995 · 214 citations · 11 references
Social SciencesBusiness EconomicsEconomicsIndustrial OrganizationMicroeconomicsRegulatory EconomicsMonopolistic CompetitionMultimarket CompetitionPerfect CompetitionRegulationVertical IntegrationVertical MergersRegulatory Impact On CompetitionVertical CompetitionVertical EffectsVertical Market PowerVertical Price EffectsVertical Relationships
In an industry where naturally monopolistic and competitive activities are vertically related, should the natural monopolist be allowed also to operate in the deregulated competitive sector? This paper assumes that monopoly pricing behavior is regulated and, therefore, the effect of vertical integration on the task of regulation is central to the analysis. When vertical integration by the monopolist is allowed, the regulator's task is made harder as the monopolist has anticompetitive incentives to raise rivals' costs. On the other hand, integration may lead to less duplication of fixed costs. The overall welfare comparison between separation and integration is ambiguous. Copyright 1995 by The Review of Economic Studies Limited.
11
Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Costs
David P. Baron, Roger B. Myerson · Econometrica · 1982 · 1.8K citations
Free Entry and Social Inefficiency
N. Gregory Mankiw, Michael D. Whinston · The RAND Journal of Economics · 1986 · 1.3K citations
Using Cost Observation to Regulate Firms
Jean‐Jacques Laffont, Jean Tirole · Journal of Political Economy · 1986 · 1.2K citations · Full text
Vertical Integration and Market Foreclosure
Oliver Hart, Jean Tirole, Dennis W. Carlton et al. · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Microeconomics · 1990 · 1K citations · Full text
Steven C. Salop, David T. Scheffman · Journal of Industrial Economics · 1987 · 436 citations