IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · 2007 · 180 citations · 21 references
EngineeringMechanical EngineeringRobotics EngineeringMobile RoboticsRoboticsSwarm RoboticsEvolutionary ComputationMetaheuristic OptimizationObstacle AvoidanceOlfactory SystemsRobot LocalizationAdvection-diffusion DynamicsAdvection-diffusion ModelsConcentration GradientsFluid Flow PatternsOdor DetectionOdor ModelingParticle Swarm ControlParticle Swarm Optimization
This paper provides a combination of chemotaxic and anemotaxic modeling, known as odor-gated rheotaxis (OGR), to solve real-world odor source localization problems. Throughout the history of trying to mathematically localize an odor source, two common biometric approaches have been used. The first approach, chemotaxis, describes how particles flow according to local concentration gradients within an odor plume. Chemotaxis is the basis for many algorithms, such as particle swarm optimization (PSO). The second approach is anemotaxis, which measures the direction and velocity of a fluid flow, thus navigating "upstream" within a plume to localize its source. Although both chemotaxic and anemotaxic based algorithms are capable of solving overly-simplified odor localization problems, such as dynamic-bit-matching or moving-parabola problems, neither method by itself is adequate to accurately address real life scenarios. In the real world, odor distribution is multi-peaked due to obstacles in the environment. However, by combining the two approaches within a modified PSO-based algorithm, odors within an obstacle-filled environment can be localized and dynamic advection-diffusion problems can be solved. Thus, robots containing this modified particle swarm optimization algorithm (MPSO) can accurately trace an odor to its source
21
Tracking and optimizing dynamic systems with particle swarms
R.C. Eberhart, Yuhui Shi · 2002 · 1K citations
Distributed odor source localization
A.T. Hayes, Alcherio Martinoli, R.M. Goodman · IEEE Sensors Journal · 2002 · 451 citations