A SYSTEM OF CONTINUOUS FERMENTATION*

L. R. Bishop

Journal of the Institute of Brewing · 1970 · 32 citations · 1 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Continuous fermentation plants progress through distinct development stages to achieve commercial viability. The system employs sterile wort storage, controlled oxygenation, cooling, yeast separation, and temperature‑regulated stirred vessels to maintain yeast at maximum growth rate without recirculation, allowing smooth output control and a combined capacity of 20,000 barrels per week across four breweries. Commercial‑scale production of all top‑fermentation and lager styles has matched batch beer quality in taste and analysis, proving flexible, economical, and high‑quality operation.

Abstract

A description is given of the development stages of a successful type of continuous fermentation plant. In this, provision is made for appropriate wort storage under safe conditions, for sterilization of the wort followed by controlled oxygenation under sterile conditions before entering the plant, for an effective beer cooling and yeast separation afterwards and for appropriate beer storage vessels. In the plant itself a suitable yeast is developed to and maintained at the maximum growth rate for that particular temperature. Beer output can then be smoothly controlled and beer characteristics maintained by adjusting the temperature of the two stirred fermentation vessels in conjunction with corresponding changes in the rate of supply of wort to the plant. No yeast recirculation is employed. All types of top fermentation beer (including strong beers) as well as lager have been produced on the commercial scale without difficulty. There has been close equivalence to the corresponding batch beers, as shown by analyses and by taste as judged by panels and by the public. The system has been installed in four breweries which have at present a total maximum output of 20,000 barrels per week. It has proved flexible in operation. Its use is considered amply justified both on the grounds of economics and maintenance of high beer quality.

References

1