State of Research on Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Survey of Empirical Studies Published During 1998—2010 (April)

David Yun Dai, Joan Ann Swanson, Hong‐Yu Cheng

Gifted Child Quarterly · 2011 · 153 citations · 19 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Research on giftedness has mapped broad conceptual spaces linking creativity, achievement, identification, and talent development to psychological and educational implications, yet these spaces remain loosely organized and a gap persists between theory and practice. The authors call for more systematic, sustainable research programs and greater coordination among researchers to advance the field. The authors surveyed 1,234 empirical studies on giftedness, gifted education, and creativity from 1998–2010 using PsycINFO and targeted journals, categorizing them by main topics, methods, and conceptual spaces. The survey identified four main research topics—creativity/creatively gifted, achievement/underachievement, identification, and talent development—and revealed that qualitative studies account for a quarter of the literature while descriptive (comparative and correlational) research dominates.

Abstract

This study surveyed 1,234 empirical studies on giftedness, gifted education, and creativity during 1998—2010 (April), using PsycINFO database and targeted journals as main sources, with respect to main topics these studies focused on, methods they used for investigation, and the conceptual spaces they traversed. Four main research topics emerged from the survey: creativity/creatively gifted, achievement/underachievement, identification, and talent development. Rich and broad conceptual spaces linking these four categories to their psychological underpinnings and educational implications have been explored by this body of research, though the conceptual spaces are still too loosely organized to be seen as paradigmatic. Several prominent trends are identified, including the emergent qualitative studies (accounting for a quarter of the total studies) and the dominance of descriptive (comparative and correlational) research. Although most psychosocial studies are conducted in the context of gifted education, there still seems to be a gap between theory and practice, between psychological understanding of gifted development and promoting such development through education. More systematic, sustainable programs of research and more coordination among researchers are warranted to move the field forward.

References

19