Consensus Accuracy Evaluation

Consensus Accuracy Evaluation is a validation methodology that assesses the correctness and reliability of an assembly by quantitatively measuring the degree of agreement among multiple independent assessments or data sources, distinguishing itself through its reliance on aggregated consensus as the criterion for accuracy rather than a single authoritative reference.

24

Publications

4.6K

Citations

66

Authors

42

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

9

Authors

66

  1. ML
    Matthew Lease

    The University of Texas at Austin, United States

    2 publications · 120 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. LM
    Louise M. Judd

    The University of Melbourne, Australia

    2 publications · 3.4K citations

    2

    h-index

  3. KE
    Kathryn E. Holt

    The University of Melbourne, Australia

    2 publications · 3.4K citations

    2

    h-index

  4. RR
    Ryan R. Wick

    The University of Melbourne, Australia

    2 publications · 3.4K citations

    2

    h-index

  5. SJ
    Stephen J. Hoch

    University of Pennsylvania, United States

    2 publications · 314 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 66

Venues

  1. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    2 publications · 314 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

    JNIS · 1 publications · 19 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound

    1 publications · 17 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Financial Analysts Journal

    FAJ · 1 publications · 59 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Knowledge and Information Systems

    1 publications · 24 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5