After-action Review

An After-Action Review is a structured retrospective evaluation, belonging to the genus of organizational learning mechanisms, that systematically identifies and analyzes performance outcomes, decisions, and actions taken during a specific incident or exercise—particularly within high-stakes domains such as Mass Casualty Management—to differentiate effective practices from deficiencies and thereby inform future improvements in operational and managerial frameworks.

33

Publications

1.6K

Citations

107

Authors

43

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

7

Authors

107

  1. JA
    Joseph A. Allen

    University of Nebraska at Omaha, United States

    5 publications · 216 citations

    5

    h-index

  2. WA
    Winfred Arthur

    Texas A&M University, United States

    3 publications · 139 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. CS
    Cliff Scott

    University of North Carolina at Charlotte, United States

    3 publications · 135 citations

    3

    h-index

  4. CP
    Christopher Perdriau

    Oregon State University, United States

    2 publications · 29 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. NG
    Nicholas George Kiddle

    Oregon State University, United States

    2 publications · 29 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 107

Venues

  1. Journal of Applied Psychology

    2 publications · 331 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. 2018 Annual IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon)

    Conference · 1 publications · 17 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Military Medicine

    1 publications · 23 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Human Performance

    1 publications · 12 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. 1

    h-index

1–5