Communications Biology · 2022 · 142 citations · 26 references
ComputingBioinformaticsVisualizationComputational BiologyScientific VisualizationTranscriptomicsDimension ReductionDimensionality ReductionHigh-dimensional Data VisualizationSingle-cell Data VisualizationSingle-cell VisualizationComputational EfficiencyComputational Efficiency AnalysisLocal StructureSingle-cell Data PreprocessingT-sne Visualization
Dimension reduction (DR) algorithms project data from high dimensions to lower dimensions to enable visualization of interesting high-dimensional structure. DR algorithms are widely used for analysis of single-cell transcriptomic data. Despite widespread use of DR algorithms such as t-SNE and UMAP, these algorithms have characteristics that lead to lack of trust: they do not preserve important aspects of high-dimensional structure and are sensitive to arbitrary user choices. Given the importance of gaining insights from DR, DR methods should be evaluated carefully before trusting their results. In this paper, we introduce and perform a systematic evaluation of popular DR methods, including t-SNE, art-SNE, UMAP, PaCMAP, TriMap and ForceAtlas2. Our evaluation considers five components: preservation of local structure, preservation of global structure, sensitivity to parameter choices, sensitivity to preprocessing choices, and computational efficiency. This evaluation can help us to choose DR tools that align with the scientific goals of the user.
26
Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data
Tim Stuart, Andrew Butler, Paul Hoffman et al. · Cell · 2019 · 16.9K citations · Full text
Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data
Yuhan Hao, Stephanie Hao, Erica Andersen‐Nissen et al. · Cell · 2021 · 16K citations · Full text
UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection
Leland McInnes, John Healy, Nathaniel Saul et al. · The Journal of Open Source Software · 2018 · 9.6K citations · Full text