BMC Bioinformatics · 2022 · 17 citations · 25 references
Life SciencesBioinformaticsGenomic Data AnalysisGenomicsSequence AnalysisDna SequencingNext-generation SequencingSequence AlignmentSequence AssemblySequence Quality ControlVariant DetectionDe Novo AssemblyDe Novo Sequence AssemblyMultiple Sequence AlignmentRandom ForestsRead Quality ControlSequence Error CorrectionSequence PreprocessingSequencing Error Correction
BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing pipelines often perform error correction as a preprocessing step to obtain cleaned input data. State-of-the-art error correction programs are able to reliably detect and correct the majority of sequencing errors. However, they also introduce new errors by making false-positive corrections. These correction mistakes can have negative impact on downstream analysis, such as k-mer statistics, de-novo assembly, and variant calling. This motivates the need for more precise error correction tools. RESULTS: We present CARE 2.0, a context-aware read error correction tool based on multiple sequence alignment targeting Illumina datasets. In addition to a number of newly introduced optimizations its most significant change is the replacement of CARE 1.0's hand-crafted correction conditions with a novel classifier based on random decision forests trained on Illumina data. This results in up to two orders-of-magnitude fewer false-positive corrections compared to other state-of-the-art error correction software. At the same time, CARE 2.0 is able to achieve high numbers of true-positive corrections comparable to its competitors. On a simulated full human dataset with 914M reads CARE 2.0 generates only 1.2M false positives (FPs) (and 801.4M true positives (TPs)) at a highly competitive runtime while the best corrections achieved by other state-of-the-art tools contain at least 3.9M FPs and at most 814.5M TPs. Better de-novo assembly and improved k-mer analysis show the applicability of CARE 2.0 to real-world data. CONCLUSION: False-positive corrections can negatively influence down-stream analysis. The precision of CARE 2.0 greatly reduces the number of those corrections compared to other state-of-the-art programs including BFC, Karect, Musket, Bcool, SGA, and Lighter. Thus, higher-quality datasets are produced which improve k-mer analysis and de-novo assembly in real-world datasets which demonstrates the applicability of machine learning techniques in the context of sequencing read error correction. CARE 2.0 is written in C++/CUDA for Linux systems and can be run on the CPU as well as on CUDA-enabled GPUs. It is available at https://github.com/fkallen/CARE .
25
Leo Breiman · Machine Learning · 2001 · 126.2K citations · Full text
QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies
Alexey Gurevich, Vladislav Saveliev, Nikolay Vyahhi et al. · Bioinformatics · 2013 · 11.5K citations · Full text
ART: a next-generation sequencing read simulator
Weichun Huang, Leping Li, Jason R. Myers et al. · Bioinformatics · 2011 · 1.8K citations