Policy and Society · 2022 · 314 citations · 26 references
Social SciencesHuman Resource ManagementEmployment PolicyLabor EconomicsLabor RelationsEmploymentLaborWork-life BalanceWork-life Balance PolicyWorkforce ManagementWorking HoursHybrid WorkHybrid Work EnvironmentsRemote Work ArrangementsWork - Time TradeoffWork Interactions
The pandemic disrupted labor markets, prompting rapid experimentation with flexible work arrangements and new centralized work relationships that have laid the groundwork for a “new normal” likely to shape post‑pandemic work organization and challenge traditional employer‑employee dynamics, work hours, and work‑life balance. This study examines how the pandemic interrupted labor markets, particularly manual versus nonmanual work, and explores the future of work‑life balance and projected deviations that may drive a forthcoming policy revolution in work and employment. The authors categorize labor‑market and work‑life balance trends into acceleration, normalization, and remodelling, reflecting pre‑existing changes hastened by the pandemic, the mainstreaming of avant‑garde work practices, and alterations to pre‑pandemic setups. Hybrid and remote work will be favored for nonmanual roles but is not a universal solution; traditional practices and offices will persist, manual labor will continue current practices with higher demands, and employers will prioritize employee work‑life balance to enhance motivation and balance.
Abstract The coronavirus pandemic has interrupted labor markets, triggering massive and instant series of experimentations with flexible work arrangements, and new relationships to centralized working environments. These approaches have laid the basis for the “new normal,” likely extending into the organization of work in the post-pandemic era. These new arrangements, especially flexible work arrangements, have challenged traditional relationships with employees and employers, work time and working hours, the work–life balance (WLB), and the relationship of individuals to work. This paper investigates how labor markets have been interrupted due to the pandemic, focusing especially on manual (blue-collar) and nonmanual (white-collar) work and the future of the WLB, along with exploring the projected deviations that are driving a foreseeable future policy revolution in work and employment. This paper argues that although hybrid and remote working would be more popular in the post-pandemic for nonmanual work, it will not be “one size fits all” solution. Traditional work practices will remain, and offices will not completely disappear. Manual labor will continue current work practices with increased demands. Employers’ attention to employees’ WLB in the new normal will target employees’ motivation and achieving better WLB. These trends for the labor market and WLB are classified into three categories—those that are predicated on changes that were already underway but were accelerated with arrival of the pandemic (“acceleration”); those that represent normalization of what were once considered avant-garde ways of work (“normalization”); and those that represent modification or alteration of pre-pandemic set-up (“remodelling”).
26
How many jobs can be done at home?
Jonathan I. Dingel, Brent Neiman · Journal of Public Economics · 2020 · 2K citations · Full text