Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · 2020 · 43 citations · 17 references
AgricultureNutritionNutritional SciencesClinical NutritionDietary AssessmentHuman NutritionDiabetes ManagementDiabetes MellitusDietary ManagementFood IntakeNutrient Intake EstimationNutritional AssessmentDietary Management Of DiabetesDietary Measurement ErrorExplanatory Variable SelectionIn Silico Clinical TrialsLinear RegressionMeal Portion EstimationMultiple RegressionSubjective Mistake
Background: The error in estimating meal carbohydrates (CHO) amount is a critical mistake committed by type 1 diabetes (T1D) subjects. The aim of this study is both to investigate which factors, related to meals and subjects, affect the CHO counting error most and to develop a mathematical model of CHO counting error embeddable in T1D patient decision simulators to conduct in silico clinical trials. Methods: A published dataset of 50 T1D adults is used, which includes a patient's CHO count of 692 meals, dietitian's estimates of meal composition (used as reference), and several potential explanatory factors. The CHO counting error is modeled by multiple linear regression, with stepwise variable selection starting from 10 candidate predictors, that is, education level, insulin treatment duration, age, body weight, meal type, CHO, lipid, energy, protein, and fiber content. Inclusion of quadratic and interaction terms is also evaluated. Results: Larger errors correspond to larger meals, and most of the large meals are underestimated. The linear model selects CHO ( P < 0.00001), meal type ( P < 0.00001), and body weight ( P = 0.047), whereas its extended version embeds a quadratic term of CHO ( P < 0.00001) and interaction terms of meal type with CHO ( P = 0.0001) and fiber amount ( P = 0.001). The extended model explains 34.9% of the CHO counting error variance. Comparison with the CHO counting error description previously used in the T1D patient decision simulator shows that the proposed models return more credible realizations. Conclusions: The most important predictors of CHO counting errors are CHO and meal type. The mathematical models proposed improve the description of patients' behavior in the T1D patient decision simulator.
17
Nutrition Therapy Recommendations for the Management of Adults With Diabetes
Alison B. Evert, Jackie L. Boucher, Marjorie Cypress et al. · Diabetes Care · 2013 · 1.1K citations · Full text
The UVA/PADOVA Type 1 Diabetes Simulator
Chiara Dalla Man, Francesco Micheletto, Dayu Lv et al. · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · 2014 · 776 citations · Full text
Medicine, Endocrinology, Physiology +16
Daniel Rhyner, Hannah Loher, Joachim Dehais et al. · Journal of Medical Internet Research · 2016 · 117 citations · Full text