Earth and Space Science · 2020 · 21 citations · 18 references
Social SciencesEarth SciencesGenderSocial DemographyWomen's StudiesBiasFemale AuthorshipGender BiasImplicit BiasSocial Network AnalysisWomen In ScienceAge-sex DistributionAge-specific DistributionCo-authorship NetworksGender In ScienceImplicit Bias ReductionScientific Collaboration NetworksWomen In GeoscienceWomen Scientists' Career Trajectories
Abstract Author networks play a key role in doing science. Developing networks is critical for career advancement in a variety of ways, and differences in networks may be a core reason for persistence of implicit bias, particularly with regards to gender. Combining the American Geophysical Union (AGU) Fall Meeting abstracts from 2014–2018 with self‐identified AGU member data on birth year and gender provides a large database of more than 400,000 unique coauthor interactions that we use to examine author networks by age, gender, and country. Age data are necessary to disambiguate the effect of a historic lack of women in the Earth and Space Science. The data show that women's networks are closer to those expected from the age–gender distribution of the overall membership; whereas, networks of men include more men than expected. Women also have more male coauthors within their age cohort than expected from the membership distribution. Women's networks are also less international than their male colleagues in most age cohorts. These differences start in the youngest age cohort. These data indicate that addressing implicit bias requires efforts at purposefully encouraging and developing more balanced author networks, particularly in early‐career scientists. Recent work suggests that this will also improve science outputs.
18
Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards
Donna K. Ginther, Walter T. Schaffer, Joshua D. Schnell et al. · Science · 2011 · 1.1K citations · Full text
The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship
Jevin D. West, Jennifer Jacquet, Molly M. King et al. · PLoS ONE · 2013 · 903 citations · Full text
Gender diversity leads to better science
Mathias Wullum Nielsen, Sharla Alegria, Love Börjeson et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2017 · 544 citations · Full text
Gender bias in scholarly peer review
Markus Helmer, Manuel Schottdorf, Andreas Neef et al. · eLife · 2017 · 380 citations · Full text