RAUSP Management Journal · 2019 · 367 citations · 8 references
Measurement TheoryEngineeringSocial PsychologyGeneralizability TheoryAttitudes Measurement ScalesEducationPractical AspectsFace ValidationPsychometricsPerformance Measurement SystemsClassical Test TheoryMeasurement ScalePsychologyAttitude TheorySurvey (Human Research)BiasApplied MeasurementMeasurement ToolsPsychological EvaluationSurvey MethodologySemantic ValidationReliabilityBehavioral SciencesTest DevelopmentSocial ImpactValidity TheoryEducational MeasurementPersuasionPsychological Measurement
The paper presents the fundamental and practical aspects of developing and validating attitude measurement scales, filling gaps not covered in existing literature. It proposes a four‑stage methodological framework—literature review or expert interviews, theoretical/face validation, semantic validation with respondents, and statistical validation—to guide researchers through the development and validation process. The authors’ experience shows that this practical, step‑by‑step guide effectively supports researchers in designing, validating, and analyzing attitude scales.
Purpose This paper aims to present the fundamental aspects for the development and validation (D&V) of attitudes’ measurement scale, as well as its practical aspects that are not deeply explored in books and manuals. These aspects are the results of a long experience of the authors and arduous learning with errors and mistakes. Design/methodology/approach The nature of this paper is methodological and can be very useful for an initial reading on the theme that it rests. This paper presents four D&V stages: literature review or interviews with experts; theoretical or face validation; semantic validation or validation with possible respondents; and statistical validation. Findings This is a methodological paper, and its main finding is the usefulness for researchers. Research limitations/implications The main implication of this paper is to support researchers on the process of D&V of measurement scales. Practical implications Became a step-by-step guide to researchers on the D&V of measurement scales. Social implications Support researchers on their data collection and analysis. Originality/value This is a practical guide, with tips from seasoned scholars to help researchers on the D&V of measurement scales.
8
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Lee J. Cronbach, Paul E. Meehl · Psychological Bulletin · 1955 · 10.7K citations
The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis
Henry F. Kaiser · Psychometrika · 1958 · 7.5K citations
Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity
Mary R. Lynn · Nursing Research · 1986 · 6.1K citations
A Meta-Analysis of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha
Robert A. Peterson · Journal of Consumer Research · 1994 · 2.9K citations