Annals of Oncology · 2017 · 352 citations · 15 references
MedicineMolecular MedicineOncologyCancer GeneticsMetastasisMolecular OncologyCancer Molecular DiagnosticsCirculating Tumor Dna AnalysisColorectal CancerMalignant NeoplasmsMutation AnalysisTumor CharacterizationCirculating Tumor Dna DetectionCirculating Tumor Dna TestingColorectal Cancer DiagnosisMetastatic Disease MonitoringOncogenic Ras MutationsPlasma GenotypingTumor Mutation AnalysisTumor Mutation Detection
BACKGROUND: RAS assessment is mandatory for therapy decision in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. This determination is based on tumor tissue, however, genotyping of circulating tumor (ct)DNA offers clear advantages as a minimally invasive method that represents tumor heterogeneity. Our study aims to evaluate the use of ctDNA as an alternative for determining baseline RAS status and subsequent monitoring of RAS mutations during therapy as a component of routine clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: RAS mutational status in plasma was evaluated in mCRC patients by OncoBEAM™ RAS CRC assay. Concordance of results in plasma and tissue was retrospectively evaluated. RAS mutations were also prospectively monitored in longitudinal plasma samples from selected patients. RESULTS: Analysis of RAS in tissue and plasma samples from 115 mCRC patients showed a 93% overall agreement. Plasma/tissue RAS discrepancies were mainly explained by spatial and temporal tumor heterogeneity. Analysis of clinico-pathological features showed that the site of metastasis (i.e. peritoneal, lung), the histology of the tumor (i.e. mucinous) and administration of treatment previous to blood collection negatively impacted the detection of RAS in ctDNA. In patients with baseline mutant RAS tumors treated with chemotherapy/antiangiogenic, longitudinal analysis of RAS ctDNA mirrored response to treatment, being an early predictor of response. In patients RAS wt, longitudinal monitoring of RAS ctDNA revealed that OncoBEAM was useful to detect emergence of RAS mutations during anti-EGFR treatment. CONCLUSION: The high overall agreement in RAS mutational assessment between plasma and tissue supports blood-based testing with OncoBEAM™ as a viable alternative for genotyping RAS of mCRC patients in routine clinical practice. Our study describes practical clinico-pathological specifications to optimize RAS ctDNA determination. Moreover, OncoBEAM™ is useful to monitor RAS in patients undergoing systemic therapy to detect resistance and evaluate the efficacy of particular treatments.
15
Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Early- and Late-Stage Human Malignancies
Chetan Bettegowda, Mark Sausen, Rebecca Leary et al. · Science Translational Medicine · 2014 · 5.1K citations · Full text
ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Eric Van Cutsem, Andrés Cervantes, René Adam et al. · Annals of Oncology · 2016 · 3.4K citations · Full text
Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics
Frank Diehl, Kerstin Schmidt, Michael A. Choti et al. · Nature Medicine · 2008 · 2.7K citations · Full text
Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer
Sandra Misale, Rona Yaeger, Sebastijan Hobor et al. · Nature · 2012 · 1.9K citations · Full text
The molecular evolution of acquired resistance to targeted EGFR blockade in colorectal cancers
Luis A. Díaz, Richard T. Williams, Jian Wu et al. · Nature · 2012 · 1.7K citations · Full text