Publication | Closed Access
Coherence Threshold and the Continuity of Processing: The RI-Val Model of Comprehension
104
Citations
63
References
2016
Year
NeurolinguisticsSemantic ProcessingLanguage DevelopmentCognitionPsycholinguisticsLanguage LearningSocial SciencesExperimental PragmaticReading ComprehensionLanguage TestingCoherence Threshold AssumptionLanguage AcquisitionCognitive DevelopmentMemoryReadingReading DifficultiesLanguage StudiesCognitive ScienceCoherence ThresholdReading FailureRi-val ModelChunking (Psychology)Human CognitionExperimental PsychologyLanguage ComprehensionReading Comprehension StrategiesLinguisticsCognitive Psychology
Common to all models of reading comprehension is the assumption that a reader's level of comprehension is heavily influenced by their standards of coherence (van den Broek, Risden, & Husbye-Hartman, 1995 van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartmann, E. (1995). The role of readers' standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 353–373). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]). Our discussion focuses on a subcomponent of the readers' standards of coherence: the coherence threshold. We situate this discussion within our RI-Val model of comprehension in which we assume that three prominent processes—activation, integration, and validation—all run to completion regardless of whether readers have reached their coherence threshold. This continuity assumption provides the basis for predictions about the timing of processing effects both before and after the reader has reached the coherence threshold. We suggest that the coherence threshold assumption may have implications for several current areas of discourse processing research.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1