Publication | Open Access
Identifying Pathways Between Socioeconomic Status and Language Development
422
Citations
137
References
2016
Year
Language DevelopmentAtypical Language DevelopmentEducationEarly Childhood LanguageLiteracy DevelopmentLanguage EducationBilingual Language DevelopmentEarly Childhood EducationChild LiteracyChild LanguageLanguage AcquisitionLinguistic DiversitySchool-age LanguageLanguage StudiesLanguage AbilitySocial SkillsSociolinguisticsEarly Childhood DevelopmentLanguage MeasurementChild DevelopmentEarly EducationSpeech DevelopmentEarly Childhood LiteracyLanguage InterventionLinguisticsAcademic Achievement
Low‑income children consistently lag behind peers on standardized language tests, creating long‑term academic gaps. The review aims to explain how socioeconomic status affects early language development and to highlight strategies for enriching language experiences across socioeconomic groups. The authors review literature on SES–language links, identify child characteristics, parent–child interaction, and learning resource availability as key pathways, and evaluate interventions targeting these pathways. Future studies should examine diverse contexts of language acquisition and use culturally sensitive measurement methods.
Children from low-income backgrounds consistently perform below their more advantaged peers on standardized measures of language ability, setting long-term trajectories that translate into gaps in academic achievement. Our primary goals in this review are to describe how and why this is so, in order to focus attention on ways to enrich early language experiences across socioeconomic strata. We first review the literature on the relation between socioeconomic status (SES) and language ability across domains in early childhood. We then identify three potential pathways by which SES might influence language development—child characteristics, parent–child interaction, and availability of learning resources—recognizing the complicated interaction between the child's own language learning skill and his/her environmental support. Finally, we review interventions that target these three pathways with an eye toward best practice. Future research should focus on the diversity of contexts in which children acquire language and adopt methods of language measurement that are sensitive to cultural variation.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1