The Positive and Negative Effects of Anger on Dispute Resolution: Evidence From Electronically Mediated Disputes.

Ray Friedman, Cameron Anderson, Jeanne M. Brett, Mara Olekalns, Nathan Goates, Cara Cherry Lisco

Journal of Applied Psychology · 2004 · 34 citations · 48 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Anger in mediation is debated as either counterproductive or potentially productive. The authors tested these competing theories of emotion by using data from online mediation. Using online mediation data, the authors investigated anger precursors—including dispute value, reputation, and reciprocal focus on resolution. Expression of anger lowers mediation resolution rates by provoking angry responses from the other party, but when respondents are especially vulnerable, anger expressions do not hinder settlement.

Abstract

Scholars have argued that anger expressed by participants in mediation is counterproductive; yet, there is also reason to believe that expressions of anger can be productive. The authors tested these competing theories of emotion by using data from online mediation. Results show that expression of anger lowers the resolution rate in mediation and that this effect occurs in part because expressing anger generates an angry response by the other party. However, when respondents are especially vulnerable, expressions of anger by the filer do not hinder settlement. The authors also examined precursors to anger, such as value of dispute and reputation, and the degree to which a focus on dispute resolution is reciprocated.

References

48