An Inoculation Theory Explanation for the Effects of Corporate Issue/Advocacy Advertising Campaigns

Michael Burgoon, Michael Pfau, Thomas Birk

Communication Research · 1995 · 82 citations · 38 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Issue/advocacy advertising campaigns are popular, yet their overall impact has been understudied. The study tests the hypothesis that such campaigns serve as inoculation against attitude slippage and boost sponsor credibility among supporters, rather than changing attitudes. The authors conceptualize issue/advocacy advertising as a vehicle for inoculation and credibility enhancement. Experimental results show that issue/advocacy advertising inoculates against attitude change and protects sponsor credibility after exposure to opposing attacks.

Abstract

Despite the popularity of issue / advocacy advertising campaigns, there has been limited empirical study of their overall impact. This investigation posits that issue / advocacy advertising should be viewed as a vehicle for inoculating against attitude slippage and for enhancing the sponsor's credibility among people who already favor a corporation's position, rather than as a tool to change attitudes. An experimental test of attitudinal and image effects of issue / advocacy advertising confirmed this theoretical view. The results indicated that issue / advocacy advertising inoculates against attitude change, while simultaneously protecting sponsors against slippage in ratings of source credibility, after exposure to a persuasive attack on behalf of an opposing position. These results are discussed in terms of their theoretical and policy implications.

References

38