The Validity of Informal Reading Comprehension Measures

TLDR

The study evaluated the criterion, construct, and concurrent validity of four informal reading comprehension measures—question answering, recall, oral passage reading, and cloze techniques. Seventy mildly to moderately handicapped middle and junior high boys completed the four informal measures in a counterbalanced order, followed by separate criterion tests (Stanford Achievement Test subtests). Correct oral reading rate showed the strongest criterion validity, with written recall also acceptable; both measures demonstrated adequate construct and concurrent validity.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the criterion, construct, and concurrent validity of four informal reading comprehension measures: question answering tests, recall measures, oral passage reading tests, and cloze techniques. Mildly and moderately handicapped middle and junior high school boys (N = 70) were administered the informal measures in one sitting, with four passages equally represented across the four measures and with the administration order of measures counterbalanced. Criterion tests, the Reading Comprehension and Word Study Skills subtests of the Stanford Achievement Test, also were administered in a separate sitting. Results indicated that the correct oral reading rate score demonstrated the strongest criterion validity, with adequate construct and concurrent validity. A second acceptable index was the written recall measure. Implications for designing reading comprehension monitoring procedures are discussed.