Regeneration and reprogramming compared

Bea Christen, Vanesa Robles, Marina Raya, Ida Paramonov, Juan Carlos Izpisúa Belmonte

BMC Biology · 2010 · 96 citations · 58 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Dedifferentiation naturally occurs during epimorphic regeneration in fish and amphibians and is also induced in mature cells when pluripotency transcription factors are overexpressed. The study aimed to determine whether dedifferentiation in regeneration parallels somatic cell reprogramming to induced pluripotent stem cells and to investigate a shared regulatory mechanism. Expression levels of key pluripotency factors were measured in regenerating and non‑regenerating tissues and compared to a pluripotent reference cell. Several pluripotency genes, including oct4 and sox2, were expressed during regeneration and required for fin regrowth, yet their levels did not increase as in iPSC induction, showing that blastema cells do not become fully pluripotent but share a partially reprogrammed state with iPSCs.

Abstract

Abstract Background Dedifferentiation occurs naturally in mature cell types during epimorphic regeneration in fish and some amphibians. Dedifferentiation also occurs in the induction of pluripotent stem cells when a set of transcription factors ( Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc ) is over expressed in mature cell types. Results We hypothesised that there are parallels between dedifferentiation or reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells and the natural process of dedifferentiation during epimorphic regeneration. We analysed expression levels of the most commonly used pluripotency associated factors in regenerating and non-regenerating tissue and compared them with levels in a pluripotent reference cell. We found that some of the pluripotency associated factors ( oct4/pou5f1, sox2, c-myc, klf4, tert, sall4, zic3, dppa2/4 and fut1 , a homologue of ssea1 ) were expressed before and during regeneration and that at least two of these factors ( oct4, sox2 ) were also required for normal fin regeneration in the zebrafish. However these factors were not upregulated during regeneration as would be expected if blastema cells acquired pluripotency. Conclusions By comparing cells from the regeneration blastema with embryonic pluripotent reference cells we found that induced pluripotent stem and blastema cells do not share pluripotency. However, during blastema formation some of the key reprogramming factors are both expressed and are also required for regeneration to take place. We therefore propose a link between partially reprogrammed induced pluripotent stem cells and the half way state of blastema cells and suggest that a common mechanism might be regulating these two processes.

References

58