Habits of the Mind: Challenges for Multidisciplinary Engagement

Myra H. Strober

Social Epistemology · 2006 · 58 citations · 28 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The extraordinary complexity of knowledge today creates a paradox, as disciplinary specialization is required for depth yet can limit innovation by preventing faculty from exploring questions outside their field and adopting methods from other disciplines. The article seeks to understand factors that enhance or impede cross‑disciplinary conversations and their possible long‑term effects. The study used 46 interviews with seminar participants to examine faculty members who voluntarily entered multidisciplinary contexts. The findings suggest implications for how disciplines and universities are organized.

Abstract

The extraordinary complexity of knowledge in today's world creates a paradox. On the one hand, its sheer volume and intricacy demand disciplinary specialization, even sub‐specialization; innovative research or scholarship increasingly requires immersion in the details of one's disciplinary dialogue. On the other hand, that very immersion can limit innovation. Disciplinary specialization inhibits faculty from broadening their intellectual horizons—considering questions of importance outside their discipline, learning other methods for answering these questions and pondering the possible significance of other disciplines' findings for their own work. This article seeks to understand more fully the factors that enhance and impede cross‐disciplinary conversations and the possible longer‐term effects of those conversations. Based on 46 interviews with a sample of seminar participants, it examines the experiences of faculty members who ventured (voluntarily) into multidisciplinary waters and its implications for the organization of disciplines and universities.

References

28