Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Action

Judi Harris, Mark Hofer

Journal of Research on Technology in Education · 2011 · 537 citations · 17 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) shapes instructional planning, but its specific influence remains unclear. The study aims to identify ways to enhance teachers' TPACK. The authors conducted an interpretivist study of experienced secondary social studies teachers, collecting interview data and planning products before and after a TPACK‑focused professional development program to examine the evolution of TPACK‑in‑action. Teachers reported that after the professional development they selected and used learning activities and technologies more consciously, strategically, and variably, their instructional planning became more student‑centered with a focus on intellectual engagement, and they raised quality standards for technology integration, leading to more judicious use of educational technology.

Abstract

How does teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) inform their instructional planning? How can this knowledge be enhanced? In an interpretivist study of experienced secondary social studies teachers' planning, we sought to discover clues to the nature and development of these teachers' TPACK-in-action as it was expressed in their planning processes. Comparisons of interview data and planning products before and after engaging in professional development that addressed content-focused, TPACK-based learning activity types (Harris & Hofer, 2009) revealed three primary findings, each supported by participating teachers' oral and written reflections upon their learning. The participating teachers' (a) selection and use of learning activities and technologies became more conscious, strategic, and varied; (b) instructional planning became more student-centered, focusing primarily upon students' intellectual, rather than affective, engagement; and (c) quality standards for technology integration were raised, resulting in deliberate decisions for more judicious educational technology use.

References

17