Success Traps, Dynamic Capabilities and Firm Performance

Catherine L. Wang, Chaminda Senaratne, Mohammed Rafiq

British Journal of Management · 2014 · 304 citations · 91 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Dynamic capabilities are key to differential firm performance, yet firms vary in their ability to develop and apply them, partly because success traps can lock firms into exploiting existing competences and stifle the development of new capabilities. This study investigates how success traps influence dynamic capabilities and, in turn, firm performance, while considering firm strategy and market dynamism. Using survey data from 113 UK high‑tech SMEs, the authors identify common dynamic capabilities—absorptive and transformative capabilities—across firms and assess their relationships with success traps and performance. The analysis shows that success traps strongly and negatively affect dynamic capabilities, which in turn have a weak positive effect on performance, and that dynamic capability development is driven by internal factors rather than external market dynamism.

Abstract

Dynamic capabilities ( DCs ) are fundamental to the understanding of differential firm performance. However, the question remains why some firms are better at developing and applying DCs than others. In particular, successful firms have been warned against the tendency to fall into a success or competence trap, where success reinforces exploitation of existing competences and crowds out exploration of new competences, hindering the development of DCs . Therefore, this study examines the effects of success traps on DCs and consequently firm performance, taking into account firm strategy and market dynamism. To facilitate this, our study also identifies the commonalities of DCs across firms. Drawing on survey data from 113 UK high‐tech small and medium‐sized firms, we find that success traps have a significant, strong negative effect on DCs , which in turn have a weak positive effect on firm performance; DCs are manifested through absorptive and transformative capabilities as two common features across firms. We also find that the development and application of DCs is related to internal factors (such as success traps) rather than external factors (such as market dynamism).

References

91