Small Group Research · 2002 · 34 citations · 60 references
Social PsychologyIndividual DifferencesSocial InfluenceLaboratory ExperimentCommunicationOrganizational ConflictOrganizational BehaviorPsychologySocial SciencesCommunication TechnologiesCyberpsychologyComputer-mediated CommunicationConflict ManagementSocial IdentityBehavioral SciencesCommunication EffectsMedia DifferencesApplied Social PsychologySocial CognitionPersonality PsychologyInterpersonal CommunicationOrganizational CommunicationWorkplace ConflictComputer-mediated DyadsTechnology Acceptance ModelHuman-computer InteractionCognitive Conflict TaskRelational CommunicationArtsPersonality Science
Prior information systems research has found that numerous contextual factors, including individual differences, can influence which communication technologies are chosen for various situations. Because the adaptability of information and communication technologies to individual preferences and different environments is continuously improving, it has become increasingly feasible and important to investigate the relationships between individual characteristics (such as personality) and features of technology. In this study, the communication environment (face to face vs. synchronous computer mediated) and partners’ personality types (extraversion-introversion) in two-person groups were contrasted in a laboratory experiment. Dyads addressed a cognitive conflict task—allocation of limited funds to controversial social causes. Contrary to the hypotheses, introverts exerted influence over extraverts. As expected, extraverts were more satisfied with the process than introverts, and face-to-face dyads required less time, were more satisfied, and perceived less conflict than computer-mediated dyads. Given the ease with which some modern technologies can be melded to each individual’s preferences and that prior research has shown that individual differences influence the selection of technologies, these results have important implications for future information systems researchers and technology designers.
60
Research in Organizational Behavior
Eliot R. Hammer, L. L. Cummings, Barry M. Staw · Academy of Management Review · 1984 · 11.1K citations
B. E. Partridge, Henry Mintzberg · Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977) · 1974 · 6.3K citations