GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency

GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence

Howard Balshem, Mark Helfand, Holger J. Schünemann et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 7.7K citations

Reliability, Grade Guidelines, Quality Criterion +7

GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)

Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Gunn Elisabeth Vist et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 2.7K citations

Grade Guidelines, Quality Criterion, Education +6

GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes

Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Regina Kunz et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2010 · 1.8K citations

Public Policy, Grade Guidelines, Important Outcomes +12

Undue reliance on I2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead

Gerta Rücker, Guido Schwarzer, James R. Carpenter et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2008 · 1.2K citations · Full text

Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses

Xin Sun, Matthias Briel, Stephen D. Walter et al. · BMJ · 2010 · 774 citations

Engineering, Group Phenomenon, Social Psychology +19