American Economic Journal Microeconomics · 2010 · 50 citations · 30 references
Social SciencesEconomicsSocial PsychologyBehavioral EconomicsDecision TheoryGame TheoryAsymmetric InformationBargaining TheoryBayesian GamesBehavioral Game TheoryNash EquilibriumNoncooperative Game TheoryBargaining With Asymmetric InformationBargaining With Incomplete InformationBargaining With Private InformationEquilibriumGame Theoretic ReasoningIncomplete Information BargainingNoncooperative BargainingStrategic Deception
This paper proposes an equilibrium approach to belief manipulation and deception in which agents only have coarse knowledge of their opponent's strategy. Equilibrium requires the coarse knowledge available to agents to be correct, and the inferences and optimizations to be made on the basis of the simplest theories compatible with the available knowledge. The approach can be viewed as formalizing into a game theoretic setting a well documented bias in social psychology, the fundamental attribution error. It is applied to a bargaining problem, thereby revealing a deceptive tactic that is hard to explain in the full rationality paradigm. (JEL C78, D83, D84)
30
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman · 1975 · 23.1K citations
Michael Spence · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · 1973 · 15.2K citations
Rational choice and the structure of the environment.
H. A. Simon · Psychological Review · 1956 · 5.9K citations
Reputation and imperfect information
David M. Kreps, Robert Wilson · Journal of Economic Theory · 1982 · 3.1K citations