California Management Review · 2002 · 231 citations · 1 references
Shared LeadershipAdministrative LeadershipBetter Than OneOrganizational BehaviorLeadership DevelopmentManagementBusiness PressJoint LeadershipResponsible LeadershipOpinion LeadershipEducational LeadershipBusiness LeadershipLeadershipStudent LeadershipService LeadershipPerformance StudiesOrganizational CommunicationBusinessEthical LeadershipArtsPolitical ScienceCorporate Leadership
Corporate leadership is often portrayed as a solo activity, yet evidence shows shared leadership is common and frequently more effective, though arranging it is more complex than simply dividing tasks. Research at USC's Center for Effective Organizations identifies factors needed for joint leadership success, noting that sharing the limelight is harder than sharing responsibility. Shared leadership is often more effective than traditional single‑leader models.
In both the business press and in academic journals, corporate leadership typically is portrayed as a solo activity, the responsibility of one person at the top of an organizational hierarchy. However, evidence shows that shared leadership is not only common in the corporate world, it is often more effective than the storied one-man shows. Ongoing research at the University of Southern California's Center for Effective Organizations pinpoints several factors needed to make joint leadership a success. Where two—or more—individuals share leadership, it turns out that making the arrangement work is more complicated than simply divvying up the tasks. For example, sharing the limelight seems harder than sharing responsibility.
1
Will M. Bennis, James O’Toole · PubMed · 2001 · 55 citations