PLoS ONE · 2010 · 173 citations · 35 references
Life SciencesCell BiologyMolecular BiologyApoptosisDna RepairStem Cell BiologyCell-cycle ArrestCellular Radiation ResponseDna DamageDna Damage SignalingDna Damage-induced ApoptosisEmbryonic Stem CellsCheckpoint Pathway ActivationDna Damage Checkpoint ActivationDna Damage Checkpoint SignalingDna Damage Response PathwaysDna Damage ResponsesInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsRadiation-induced Cell Cycle ArrestStem Cell Dna Damage Response
BACKGROUND: Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells have the capability to undergo self-renewal and differentiation into all somatic cell types. Since they can be produced through somatic cell reprogramming, which uses a defined set of transcription factors, iPS cells represent important sources of patient-specific cells for clinical applications. However, before these cells can be used in therapeutic designs, it is essential to understand their genetic stability. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here, we describe DNA damage responses in human iPS cells. We observe hypersensitivity to DNA damaging agents resulting in rapid induction of apoptosis after γ-irradiation. Expression of pluripotency factors does not appear to be diminished after irradiation in iPS cells. Following irradiation, iPS cells activate checkpoint signaling, evidenced by phosphorylation of ATM, NBS1, CHEK2, and TP53, localization of ATM to the double strand breaks (DSB), and localization of TP53 to the nucleus of NANOG-positive cells. We demonstrate that iPS cells temporary arrest cell cycle progression in the G(2) phase of the cell cycle, displaying a lack of the G(1)/S cell cycle arrest similar to human embryonic stem (ES) cells. Furthermore, both cell types remove DSB within six hours of γ-irradiation, form RAD51 foci and exhibit sister chromatid exchanges suggesting homologous recombination repair. Finally, we report elevated expression of genes involved in DNA damage signaling, checkpoint function, and repair of various types of DNA lesions in ES and iPS cells relative to their differentiated counterparts. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: High degrees of similarity in DNA damage responses between ES and iPS cells were found. Even though reprogramming did not alter checkpoint signaling following DNA damage, dramatic changes in cell cycle structure, including a high percentage of cells in the S phase, increased radiosensitivity and loss of DNA damage-induced G(1)/S cell cycle arrest, were observed in stem cells generated by induced pluripotency.
35
Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors
Kazutoshi Takahashi, Koji Tanabe, Mari Ohnuki et al. · Cell · 2007 · 20.2K citations
Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Blastocysts
James A. Thomson, Joseph Itskovitz‐Eldor, Sander S. Shapiro et al. · Science · 1998 · 15.9K citations
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Somatic Cells
Junying Yu, Maxim A. Vodyanik, Kim Smuga-Otto et al. · Science · 2007 · 10.3K citations
DNA Double-stranded Breaks Induce Histone H2AX Phosphorylation on Serine 139
Emmy P. Rogakou, Duane R. Pilch, Ann H. Orr et al. · Journal of Biological Chemistry · 1998 · 5.4K citations · Full text