Publication | Closed Access
A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL
602
Citations
47
References
1997
Year
Inquiry-based LearningEducationClassroom DiscourseTeaching MethodLanguage TeachingTeacher EducationLearning By TeachingCritical ApproachDiscourse AnalysisLanguage StudiesSecond Language EducationPedagogyLearning SciencesTesol EducatorsFaculty MembersCritical TheoryCritical PedagogyInstructionIntercultural EducationCultureCritical LiteracySecond Language TeachingCritical ThinkingEducational Theory
Critical thinking in TESOL is a culturally embedded, relational practice rather than a set of discrete techniques, and cognitive apprenticeship is proposed as an alternative model. The article argues that TESOL educators should be cautious about adopting critical thinking pedagogies, presenting four reasons: its social practice nature, exclusivity, cultural challenges, and limited transferability. Citation: Fox (1994), p.
This article presents four more-or-less independent reasons why TESOL educators should be cautious about adopting critical thinking pedagogies in their classrooms: (a) Critical thinking may be more on the order of a non-overt social practice than a well-defined and teachable pedagogical set of behaviors; (b) critical thinking can be and has been criticized for its exclusive and reductive character; (c) teaching thinking to nonnative speakers may be fraught with cultural problems; and, (d) once having been taught, thinking skills do not appear to transfer effectively beyond their narrow contexts of instruction. A more recently developed model of cognitive instruction, cognitive apprenticeship, is then briefly discussed as a possible alternative to more traditional thinking skills pedagogies. This thing we call “critical thinking” or “analysis” has strong cultural components. It is more than just a set of writing and thinking techniques—it is a voice, a stance, a relationship with texts and family members, friends, teachers, the media, even the history of one's country. This is why “critical analysis” is so hard for faculty members to talk about; because it is learned intuitively it is easy to recognize, like a face or a personality, but it is not so easily defined and is not at all simple to explain to someone who has been brought up differently. (Fox, 1994, p. 125)
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1