PLoS Genetics · 2013 · 352 citations · 65 references
Life SciencesGeneticsMicrobiologyGenomicsMicrobial GeneticsPlant-microbe InteractionsBacterial Pathogenesis In PlantsBacterial Plant PathogensCrispr-cas SystemsPathogen RecognitionPathogenicity IslandsBacterial Crispr DefenseCrispr-cas ArraysCrispr-cas Resistance To PhagesCrispr-cas Systems In PlantsCrispr-cas Target CleavageGenetic Mobile ElementsGenomic Repeats
In prokaryotes, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) and their associated (Cas) proteins constitute a defence system against bacteriophages and plasmids. CRISPR/Cas systems acquire short spacer sequences from foreign genetic elements and incorporate these into their CRISPR arrays, generating a memory of past invaders. Defence is provided by short non-coding RNAs that guide Cas proteins to cleave complementary nucleic acids. While most spacers are acquired from phages and plasmids, there are examples of spacers that match genes elsewhere in the host bacterial chromosome. In Pectobacterium atrosepticum the type I-F CRISPR/Cas system has acquired a self-complementary spacer that perfectly matches a protospacer target in a horizontally acquired island (HAI2) involved in plant pathogenicity. Given the paucity of experimental data about CRISPR/Cas-mediated chromosomal targeting, we examined this process by developing a tightly controlled system. Chromosomal targeting was highly toxic via targeting of DNA and resulted in growth inhibition and cellular filamentation. The toxic phenotype was avoided by mutations in the cas operon, the CRISPR repeats, the protospacer target, and protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) beside the target. Indeed, the natural self-targeting spacer was non-toxic due to a single nucleotide mutation adjacent to the target in the PAM sequence. Furthermore, we show that chromosomal targeting can result in large-scale genomic alterations, including the remodelling or deletion of entire pre-existing pathogenicity islands. These features can be engineered for the targeted deletion of large regions of bacterial chromosomes. In conclusion, in DNA-targeting CRISPR/Cas systems, chromosomal interference is deleterious by causing DNA damage and providing a strong selective pressure for genome alterations, which may have consequences for bacterial evolution and pathogenicity.
65
CRISPR Provides Acquired Resistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes
Rodolphe Barrangou, Christophe Fremaux, Hélène Deveau et al. · Science · 2007 · 6.3K citations
Small CRISPR RNAs Guide Antiviral Defense in Prokaryotes
Stan J. J. Brouns, Matthijs M. Jore, Magnus Lundgren et al. · Science · 2008 · 2.6K citations · Full text
CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III
Elitza Deltcheva, Krzysztof Chylinski, Cynthia M. Sharma et al. · Nature · 2011 · 2.6K citations · Full text
RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems
Wenyan Jiang, David Bikard, David Cox et al. · Nature Biotechnology · 2013 · 2.5K citations
The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA
Josiane E. Garneau, Marie-Ève Dupuis, Manuela Villion et al. · Nature · 2010 · 2.3K citations