International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · 2008 · 361 citations · 37 references
ManagementHospitality ManagementTourism ManagementDestination ManagementStakeholder EngagementTourismDestination MarketingStakeholder AnalysisStakeholder CollaborationSustainable Destination DevelopmentSustainable TourismTourism Destination ManagementCentralityDestination LegitimacyDestination Stakeholder CoordinationDestination Stakeholder ManagementDestination StrategyStakeholder NetworksTourism Stakeholder EngagementUrban Attractions
Very few studies have applied both network and stakeholder perspectives to examine inter‑stakeholder relationships and their influence on sustainable destination development. This study examines the current network of inter‑relationships among government, community, and tourism stakeholders and their perceptions of critical stakeholders in destination development. The authors used network analysis to assess stakeholder interconnectedness and a stakeholder approach to identify critical stakeholders, thereby determining how existing relationship structures might influence sustainable destination development. Destination marketing/management organizations and resource‑holding stakeholders have the highest centrality, local government and DMOs are perceived as most legitimate and powerful, and there is a lack of bridges between industry, government, and community clusters. The study demonstrates network analysis as a tool for researchers and managers and highlights that DMOs, hotels, and attractions must lead inter‑stakeholder collaboration for sustainable destination development.
Purpose This study aims to examine the current network of inter‐relationships of stakeholders representing government, the community and the tourism and hospitality industry, and their perceptions of critical stakeholders in destination development. Design/methodology/approach While the network analysis enabled examination of the interconnectedness of stakeholders, the stakeholder approach identified the critical stakeholders in destination development. These two approaches helped determine how the existing relationship structures of destination stakeholders might influence sustainable destination development. Findings The destination marketing/management organizations (DMOs) and stakeholders with access to or possession of critical resources have the highest centrality in urban destinations. In all three clusters, local government and DMOs are perceived to hold the greatest legitimacy and power over others in destination development. It is also found that there is a lack of “bridges” between the three clusters of industry, government and the community. Research limitations/implications The study demonstrates the use of a network analysis methodology as a potential tool for researchers and managers in examining destination stakeholder relationships. Practical implications DMOs, hotels and attractions stakeholders have the most crucial roles in achieving inter‐stakeholder collaboration for sustainable destination development, particularly because the many and diverse industry actors trust or depend on them. Originality/value There are very few studies that have applied both network and stakeholder perspectives to destinations to examine the structure of inter‐stakeholder relationships and the potential influence of this relational structure on sustainable destination development.
37
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Linton C. Freeman · Social Networks · 1978 · 16.9K citations
Social Network Analysis: A Handbook.
Franz Urban Pappi · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · 1993 · 6.1K citations
Leslie M. Harris, Don A. Dillman · Journal of Marketing Research · 1979 · 1.4K citations
Social Sciences, Sociology, Communication Research Methods +10